Adapting to Change or a Redundant Profession?

Adapting to change at any time in ones career is challenging but trying to adapt to change in ones profession at the end of a career is even more challenging.

During our careers we adapt to structural change, organizational change, government change, technological change and even the loss of wonderful colleagues.

Adapting  to changes in ones calling or ones profession is something else. When one is made to feel a profession may be redundant ( no longer needed or useful; superfluous) it is very hard to accept.

Wellness Model

How does a profession become redundant?

Is it because it did not adapt to the environment surrounding it?
- the political environment
- the shifting funding envelopes
- reduced funding overall
- the shifting community environment
- the terminology of the day
- the pressures on educational institutions
- technological advancements

Is it because its founding principles are no longer valid in today's society?

• The Benefits of Recreation

Is it because of a lack of vision? 

• Rethinking Leisure Services / Repenser les services des loisirs by Ken Balmer

Is it because of a lack of leadership? 

• New Maps for New Times: A Fresh Look at Persons and Communities / De nouvelles cartes pour une nouvelle époque : un regard nouveau sur les personnes et les communautés by Ruben Nelson

• Policy Imperatives for Recreation, Sport and Physical Activity: Re-examining Foundations / Les impératifs politiques des loisirs, du sport et de l’activité physique : Revérifier les fondements by Tim Burton

It is because of a lack of a statistical  profile?

• Number of jobs, Value of infrastructure, family spending patterns, number of volunteers, park acreage, etc etc

It is because it didn't use the information available to aid in decision making?

•  Leisure Literacy

• The National Recreation Database: Towards Enhanced Functionality and Relevance / La National Recreation Database : Pour une fonctionnalité et une pertinence accrues  by Agnes Croxford and Punch Jackson

Is it because of a lack of research?

• The Economic Significance of Recreation and Parks: Quantifying the Value / La signification économique des loisirs et des parcs : Une valeur à quantifier by Tim Berrett

Is it because of an inability to create a common agenda with competing agendas?

• Recreation, Sport, Active Living, Physical Activity, Wellness

Is it because of an inability to collaborate with competing initiatives?

Is it because of a lack of political awareness & visibility?

Is it because its history was lost along the way? (teaching of the past was not passed on)
(Inuit oral history is very exacting as we found out with the discovery of one of the Franklin ships 2014; not sure the written or oral history of our profession is accurately passed on)

• Connecting the Dots... Looking Back on Federal- Provincial/Territorial and Interprovincial Sport and Recreation Council (ISRC) Involvements in Recreation by Chris Szabo

• The Evolution of the Recreation and Parks Field in Canada / L’évolution du domaine by Brian Johnston, Donald Hunter & Bill Webster

When standing at the crest of  the hill of ones career answering all those questions is quite overwhelming.

Will the meetings in Toronto November 17th & 18th on the National Recreation Framework breathe new life & energy into the recreation profession or pronounce it as officially redundant?

I will be very disappointed if it is the latter but historians will answer the questions and assess value based on the facts they are presented with on what recreation contributed to individuals, communities, institutions, provinces and our country over the last 100 plus years and how it addressed the challenges cited above.

 

Recreation Connections